This is default featured slide 1 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 2 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 3 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 4 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

This is default featured slide 5 title

Go to Blogger edit html and find these sentences.Now replace these sentences with your own descriptions.

Tampilkan postingan dengan label Buick. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Buick. Tampilkan semua postingan

Kamis, 13 Januari 2011

Reviewing the 2011 Buick LaCrosse

Why isn’t Buick doing more to advertise the 2010 LaCrosse? By rights, this car should be puttin’ a hurtin’ on the Lexus ES350 – known for years as the best Buick the Japanese ever built. And making competitors like Acura look usurious for charging close to $50k for cars like the RL – when a comparably equipped, every-bit-as-nice all-wheel-drive LaCrosse lists for less than $35K.

So how come not many people outside of GM even know the LaCrosse is out there? Someone needs to get the word out.

WHAT IT IS

The LaCrosse is a mid-sized, front wheel drive or all-wheel-drive luxury sedan.

Prices start at $26,495 for a base trim CX with front-wheel-drive and four-cylinder engine and range upward from there to a top-of-the-line sport-themed CXS with direct-injected 3.6 liter V-6 at $33,265.

Primary competition is the $35,525 Lexus ES350 sedan, but the LaCrosse should also be cross-shopped against models like the $46,830-$54,250 all-wheel-drive Acura RL sedan.

WHAT’S NEW FOR 2011

The LaCrosse was completely redesigned for the 2010 model year; the biggest change to the roster for 2011 is that the mid-range 3.0 V-6 available last year has been dropped. The ’11 LaCrosse comes with either a 2.4 liter four-cylinder or the optional 3.6 liter V-6.

Also, the 3.6 liter V-6 can now be teamed with all-wheel-drive in the mid-trim CXL.

WHAT’S GOOD

Supremely comfortable long-haul cruiser – as a Buick ought to be. Not an old lady’s car, as recent Buicks have tended to be. Modern, quietly classy exterior; elegant interior.

Available AWD and Heads-Up Display (HUD). Direct-injected 2.4 liter engine delivers excellent economy; good everyday power. Costs thousands less than a FWD-only Lexus ES350 or an AWD Acura RL.

WHAT’S NOT SO GOOD

Optional AWD system requires stepping up to the higher-cost CXL trim and buying the optional 3.6 liter V-6. Top-of-the-line sport-themed CXS isn’t offered with AWD.

Cruise control isn’t “active” (so the car goes faster than your set speed when going downhill). Trunk is a bit on the small side.

UNDER THE HOOD

The LaCrosse can be equipped with one of two available engines and either FWD or AWD, allowing the buyer to select a powertrain that emphasizes fuel efficiency, sportiness – or all-weather tenacity.

The standard engine in the base trim CX is a 2.4 liter, 182 hp four-cylinder teamed up with a six-speed automatic driving the front wheels. (AWD is not available with this engine.)

The 2.4 liter “Ecotec” four features fuel-saving direct injection technology and can deliver 30 mpg on the highway – which is very close to what many current-year compact economy sedans deliver. It’s also noticeably better than the mid-20s typical of mid-sized sedans that only come with larger, thirstier V-6 engines that not everyone may need. The Acura RL, for example, only manages 22 mpg on the highway – and a dismal 16 mpg in city driving.

Zero to 60 capability with the 2.4 liter engine is around 8.8-8.9 seconds – not super quick, but probably adequate for many drivers.

For more performance, Buick offers a 3.6 liter, 280 hp direct injection V-6 that can get the car to 60 mph in 7.4 seconds in the Front-wheel-drive (and sport-themed) CXS.

This engine is also optional in the mid-trim CXL with all-wheel-drive, which is slightly less quick due to the additional weight of the AWD components. Both engines come standard with six-speed automatics.

ON THE ROAD

What a nice car. The LaCrosse manages to be as laid-back-feeling as the ES350 – plush seats, extra-cushy ride, super quiet cabin – without also putting you to sleep. There’s enough in the way of steering/suspension response to make the car appealing to the under-50 buyers that represent the future of the business, without getting too aggressive (even in the sport-themed CXS) and thus sacrificing the serene driving experience that is what Buick is supposed to be all about.

The LaCrosse is both cozy and happy to pick up the pace a bit, should the need arise. For the target audience, that’s probably just right.

Four-cylinder versions offer an appealing mix of very high fuel economy (for a large car) along with adequate power for most everyday driving situations. Keep in mind that the 2.4 liter engine’s 182 hp is more power than most V-8s were producing in the late 1970s – and more than most V-6s were making as recently as the 1990s. The 2.4 liter-equipped LaCrosse isn’t slow – it’s just not sports-car quick, as the V-6 equipped versions are.

If you mostly drive at or near the posted speed limit and with the normal flow of traffic, the four may be all you need. Don’t automatically assume you have to go with the (thirstier, more expensive) optional V-6 based on memories of double-digit power figures for four-cylinder engines. Test drive one and see whether it works for you. If it does, you could drive home a LaCrosse for almost $10k less than an ES350. And $15k less than an Acura RL.

AT THE CURB

The new generation of Buicks are the result of GM’s styling studios in China where Mrs. Doubtfire’s picture isn’t hanging in a place of honor on the wall. These new Buicks are targeted at the up-and-coming middle class buyers in their 40s and 50s who want luxury and value, hold the Preparation H. This is the demographic Lexus has owned for more than a decade now, without much effort.

All it took was a dressed-up Camry (the ES350). The LaCrosse is a much better effort, all around.

First, it’s not just a rebadged Chevy with uprated trim (like the ES350, which is a tarted-up Toyota Camry).

A handsome, even bold-looking exterior with some nicely inserted Buick character touches such as the slat vents on the hood encloses what may be the most elegantly laid-out interior in a new car priced under $40k.

The dash curves upward and around, arcing downward into the door panels; soft-to-the-touch leather covers the dash, with swank-looking white stitching and very handsome-looking wood inserts for contrast. Gentle blue backlighting illuminates the controls.

It is supremely relaxing place to spend time. Compared to the Acura RL – which has a busy-looking dash and center console with lots of tiny, sometimes inscrutable, little buttons, the LaCrosse’s cabin is as welcoming as leather recliner by a crackling fire.

It is also surprisingly roomy. Though classified as a mid-sized sedan, a six-foot-three passenger (me) will enjoy as much as 6-8 inches of clearance between his knees and the back of the front seats. That is something you don’t often see outside of extended wheelbase, “L” versions of full-size luxury sedans.

The stats bear out the anecdotal evidence, too: 40.5 inches of rear seat legroom in the LaCrosse vs. 35.9 in the ES350 and 36.3 in the RL.

The Buick also wins on rear seat headroom, with 37.3 inches vs. the ES350′s 36.8 inches and the Acura’s 37.2 inches. In fact the only measure of interior space where the ES350 or RL out-room the LaCrosse is on front seat legroom, and then just barely: 42.2 inches for the Lexus and 42.3 for the Acura vs. 41.7 inches for the Buick.

You can equip this car with some very high-end features, too – including a heated steering wheel and rearseat entertainment system with twin LCD displays built into the backs of the front seat headrests. And while such features are offered in competitor models, good luck driving one home for less than $40k. Or even $50k.

Only a few small design miscues are present. First, the center console storage compartment is set back too far. It’s hard to open and access it while the vehicle is moving, or without removing your seatbelt and rotating your torso around to get at it. Second, that’s where the (sole) 12v power point is located – underneath a non-removable, flip-up cover that you have to tilt up first just to get at it. The power point itself has a fairly stiff spring-loaded cover, too – further impeding ease-of-use. If you have a radar detector, this is a hassle.

The final small nit is the smallish trunk – 13 cubic feet (vs. the ES350′s 15 cubic feet). This is the price you pay for the Executive Class rear seating.

Still, if there were an Academy Award for Best New Interior, the LaCrosse would deserve to win it.

THE REST

Buick should be very proud of this car. It’s every inch as nice as (in my opinion, nicer than) the substantially more expensive, Toyota Camry-sourced, front-wheel-drive-only ES350; it has more features for less money (including available AWD) has a better warranty (five years, 100,000 miles on the powertrain) and on and on.

If it has a weakness, it is Buick’s association with the elderly driver cruise-controlling it at 53 mph in the fast lane with his turn signal on.

But that was yesterday – and today’s Buicks are nothing like the stereotype.

In addition to the expected standard full row curtain air bags, ABS, traction and stability control, Buick offers several noteworthy additional safety features – including a blind spot warning system, rear seat side impact air bags, adaptive headlights and a Heads-Up Display (HUD) that projects key information such as your current speed directly in your line of sight, so you don’t have to take your eyes off the road to glance at the instrument cluster.


Lexus, Acura – and others beside – ought to be worried. If, that is, the word gets out… .

Selasa, 30 November 2010

Reviewing the 2011 Buick Regal


Reviewing the 2011 Buick Regal Buick is now the best-selling American car... in China. But in America, Buick is struggling to regain its footing. The traditional (read: older) Buick buyer can't support the brand's future. And buyers under 50 generally don't even think about Buick when they go car shopping. Certainly not the entry-luxury (and sport-oriented) under-50 crowd that Buick needs to win over in order to survive. That is a tough position to be in. Does the new-for-2011 Regal have the stuff necessary to make some headway? Or will it quickly become another Rental Car Special?


WHAT IT IS

The 2011 Regal is Buick's entry-level sedan. It's about the same size as a Toyota Camry or Honda Accord but (according to Buick) is aimed more at slightly smaller, more athletic near-luxury sedans like the Lexus IS250 and Acura TSX. Base price is $26,245 for the CXL with 2.4 liter engine. A performance-themed CXL turbo with 2.0 liter engine (late availability) starts at $28,745. All versions are front-wheel-drive.

WHAT'S NEW

The '11 Regal is a new model for Buick, though not for GM. The same basic car is sold in Europe under the Opel banner as the Insignia.

WHAT'S GOOD

Though not a fire-breather like the '80s-era Regal T-Types and Grand Nationals were, the latest Regal is a lot more alive-feeling (and youthful looking) than the AARP Staff Car Regals that immediately preceded it. Turbo power available late fall/spring 2011. Really sharp interior. Excellent gas mileage (30-plus on the highway). Comes with (or can be ordered with) up-to-date features and equipment such as hard-drive based navigation and music storage - you know, stuff that earlier Buicks were famous for not having.

Big (for the class) trunk. A bargain compared to the Lexus IS250 ($32,145) and Acura TSX ($29,310). A sportier alternative to a Camry for about the same money.

WHAT'S NOT GOOD

The name. Regal is a venerable Buick trademark going back several decades, but many current-day buyers who remember it probably associate it with wire-wheeled starter caskets that squat in the fast lane doing precisely 3 MPH below the posted speed limit - not exactly the image Buick is hoping to cultivate. Turbocharged 220 hp engine isn't available yet; Buick says soon.... Pricey - for what it is: $26k (to start) for a four-cylinder Buick may be a hard sell.

UNDER THE HOOD

The Regal's standard powerplant is a 2.4 liter, 182 hp four with direct fuel injection. It drives the front wheels through a six-speed automatic. For at least the first few months of production, this will be the only available powertrain. Expect a zero to 60 time of around 8.3 seconds. Fuel efficiency is very good: 20 city, 30 highway.

By spring 2011, Buick will offer a 2.0 liter, turbocharged/direct injected four good for an expected 220 hp, along with a six-speed manual transmission (and optional six-speed automatic). Acceleration with this engine promises to be appropriate to the class/price - in the mid-low seven second range. That would be competitive with cars like the Lexus IS250/Acura TSX - and quicker than a four-cylinder Camry or Honda Accord.

Gas mileage with the 2.0 engine ought to be about the same; at most a few MPGs less than the base engine delivers. At this point, it does not appear likely Buick will offer an AWD set-up in the Regal.

ON THE ROAD

Overall, this is (by far) the most engaging-to-drive Regal since the '80s-era rear-wheel-drive muscle coupes that also bore the Regal name. It comes standard with 18 inch rims and performance tires, not 15s with whitewalls. The steering actually seems connected to the road - and the suspension will hold the line if you lean on it hard in a corner. The Opel DNA (and European tuning) shows.

The only disappointment comes from under the hood. The 2.4 liter engine doesn't have the gumption to get close to 4,000 pounds (3,600 lbs. of car plus a driver and passenger) moving with suitable swiftness. A zero to 60 time in the mid eight second range isn't terrible - it's just not in the right ballpark for the competition Buick is scoping out. Both the IS250 and the Acura TSX have about 20 hp more (and in the case of the Lexus IS, two more cylinders), standard - with more on tap if you need it in the form of optional engines that get within spitting distance of 300 hp.

Granted, both the Lexus IS and the Acura TSX cost much, much more than the Buick (especially with their optional engines) so a direct comparison isn't really fair. The problem, though, is that it's not car reviewers who are making the comparison - it's Buick that's doing it. If the Regal's target competition was, say, the four-cylinder version of the Toyota Camry (or the four-cylinder Accord), ok. The Regal looks pretty good, then. But if the stack-up is against cars like the IS250 and TSX, Buick should not have released the Regal before getting the eventually-will-get-here 2.0 liter, turbo engine and six-speed stick into the lineup. Because with just the 2.4 liter engine, the Buick can't hang.

AT THE CURB

Outside, the new Regal has a pretty generic modern shape - the basic "jellybean" distinguished as a Buick by the large, one-piece grille with vertical slats and triple shield Buick badge in the middle. There are some interesting detail touches, such as the reverse "L" dimple pressed into the doors that traces its line back to the rear fender arches - and a BMW-cum Acura-ish rear section with integrated spoiler lip. Though not a head-turner, the Regal is subtly handsome - and that's in keeping with the division's history as a brand that caters to people with money and taste, but who prefer to keep a lower profile.

Inside, the layout is Euro-modern (once again, credit the Opel background) with a blue-backlit primary gauge cluster (speedo and tach, temp and gas) and LCD driver info display nestled between them. Nice seats that are a midway between aggressive sport buckets - and zero-support bench seats. There are thigh and shoulder bolsters, but they're not hug-you-too-tight and it's easy to slide in and out of the car. The touchscreen display for the nav/audio system is large and legible; the secondary buttons below it for other functions are simple to understand and generally easy to use.

A big Regal plus is significantly more backseat legroom (37.3 inches) than its two chief target competitors - the Acura TSX (34.3 inches) and Lexus IS250 (30.6 inches). It also has a noticeably larger trunk (14.2 cubic feet) vs. 13 cubic feet for the Lexus and 12.6 cubic feet for the Acura.

The Regal offers almost as much back seat and trunk space as the Toyota Camry, too (38.3 inches, 15 cubic feet) and actually beats the Honda Accord (37.2 inches, 14 cubic feet) on those points.

THE REST

This is a nicely put-together and solid-feeling car. The Regal's 2.4 liter engine has been found reliable in other cars - and GM's track record for durability and quality has been top notch for the past several years.

The only issue as I see it is that the market (the U.S. market, anyhow) doesn't currently perceive Buick as the equivalent, status-wise, of Lexus or Acura. Buick, the division, dates from an era when there were no Japanese-brand luxury cars, period - and when Buick was a stepping stone on the road to a Cadillac within GM's brand hierarchy. That is all in the past, though - and it's an open question whether Buick (or, similarly, Ford's Mercury division) can survive in a completely changed-over marketplace that just may not have room for what amounts to an almost-Lexus brand. The underpowered, take-it-or-leave-it 2.4 liter engine really hurts the car, too.

GM would have been well-advised to hold off introducing the Regal until it could at least put the not-yet-here turbocharged 2.0 liter engine on the list of available options - because $26k is a lot to ask for a four-cylinder-only car with a zero to 60 time in the mid 8 second range. This may hurt the car's image, which will hurt sales - which will eventually hurt resale values.

Safety-wise, there's OnStar - GM's voice-activated, GPS-based concierge and emergency assistance service - as well as traction and stability control, front seat side-impact and curtain air bags. All standard.

Minggu, 07 November 2010

Buick Wallpaper

Buick Wallpaper
Buick Wallpaper
Buick Wallpaper
Buick Wallpaper
Buick Wallpaper